posted on 2025-06-12, 16:03authored byOzgur Ozkaya, Andrew M Jones, Mark BurnleyMark Burnley, Arda Peker, Hakan As
<p dir="ltr">The boundary separating the severe intensity exercise domain, wherein the maximal O<sub>2</sub> uptake (V̇O<sub>2max</sub>) can be attained, from the extreme intensity exercise domain, wherein V̇O<sub>2max</sub> cannot be attained, is not widely adopted in applied sports sciences due to the labour-intensive nature of its measurement. The aim of this study was to propose an alternative and practical approach to estimate the severe-extreme domain boundary using V̇O<sub>2</sub> kinetics. Sixteen males completed an incremental exercise test and a series of constant power output exercise tests on a cycle ergometer. The relationship between time to achieve V̇O<sub>2max</sub> and time to task failure during severe-intensity exercise was calculated to estimate the highest power output at which V̇O<sub>2max</sub> was momentarily attained before task failure (P<sub>UPPERBOUND</sub>). Separately, the highest power output that provided a time to task failure that was equal to or greater than four times the time constant (τ) describing the V̇O<sub>2</sub> kinetics during severe-intensity exercise (P<sub>4-τ</sub>) was calculated. The P<sub>UPPERBOUND</sub> and P<sub>4-τ</sub> occurred at similar power outputs (379 vs. 380 W; <i>p</i> = 0.62) and were closely related (r:0.99; bias:1 W; SEE:7 W; CV%:1.92%; LoA:–14 W to 16 W). Compared to P<sub>UPPERBOUND</sub>, the P<sub>4-τ</sub> method provides a simpler and more time efficient approach to identify the severe-extreme domain boundary.</p>
Funding
Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye [TUBITAK-1002 program; project code: 222S455]
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Sports Sciences on 29 May 2025, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2510080.