A systematic review of running-related musculoskeletal injuries in runners
journal contributionposted on 04.05.2021, 13:22 by Nicolas Kakouris, Numan Yener, Daniel Fong
Running-related musculoskeletal injuries (RRMIs), especially overuse, are frequently occurring in runners. This study aimed to systematically review the literature and determine the incidence and prevalence proportion of RRMIs by anatomical location and specific pathology. An electronic database search with no date restrictions was performed in SPORTDiscus, PubMed and MEDLINE up to June 2020. Prospective studies were used to find the incidence proportion of each RRMI and anatomical location, whereas, retrospective/cross-sectional studies were used to find the prevalence proportion. A separate analysis for ultramarathon runners was performed. The overall injury incidence and prevalence were 40.2% ± 18.8 and 44.6% ± 18.4, respectively. The knee, ankle and lower leg accounted for the highest proportion of injury incidence, whereas the knee, lower leg and foot/toes had the highest proportion of injury prevalence. Achilles tendinopathy (10.3%), medial tibial stress syndrome (9.4%), patellofemoral pain syndrome (6.3%), plantar fasciitis (6.1%) and ankle sprains (5.8%) accounted for the highest proportion of injury incidence, whereas patellofemoral pain syndrome (16.7%), medial tibial stress syndrome (9.1%), plantar fasciitis (7.9%), iliotibial band syndrome (7.9%) and Achilles tendinopathy (6.6%) had the highest proportion of injury prevalence. The ankle (34.5%), knee (28.1%) and lower leg (12.9%) were the three most frequently injured sites among ultramarathoners. The injury incidence proportions by anatomical location between ultramarathoners and non ultramarathoners were not significantly different (p = 0.798). The pathologies with the highest incidence proportion of injuries were anterior compartment tendinopathy (19.4%), patellofemoral pain syndrome (15.8%) and Achilles tendinopathy (13.7%). The interpretation of epidemiological data in RRMI is limited due to several methodological issues encountered.
Read the paper on the publisher website
- Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences