posted on 2020-10-22, 09:27authored byStefan Williams, Hui FangHui Fang, Samuel D Relton, David C Wong, Taimour Alam, Jane E Alty
Background
Computer vision can measure movement from video without the time and access limitations
of hospital accelerometry / electromyography, or the requirement to hold or strap a
smartphone accelerometer.
Objective
To compare computer vision measurement of hand tremor frequency from smartphone video
with a gold standard measure, accelerometer.
Methods
37 smartphone videos of hands at rest and in posture, were recorded from 15 participants
with tremor diagnoses (9 Parkinson’s, 5 Essential Tremor, 1 Functional Tremor). Video pixel
movement was measured using the computing technique of optical flow, with
contemporaneous accelerometer recording. Fast Fourier Transform and Bland-Altman
analysis were applied. Tremor amplitude was scored by two clinicians.
Results
Bland-Altman analysis of dominant tremor frequency from smartphone video compared with
accelerometer showed excellent agreement: 95% limits of agreement -0.38 Hz to +0.35Hz. In
36 out of 37 videos (97%) there was <0.5 Hz difference between computer vision and
accelerometer measurement. There was no significant correlation between the level of
agreement and tremor amplitude.
Conclusion
The study suggests a potential new, contactless ‘point and press’ measure of tremor
frequency within standard clinical settings or telemedicine.
Funding
grant funding from National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
History
School
Science
Department
Computer Science
Published in
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
69-75
Citation
Williams, S. ... et al., (2020). Accuracy of smartphone video for contactless measurement of hand tremor frequency. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, doi:10.1002/mdc3.13119.
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Williams, S. ... et al., (2020). Accuracy of smartphone video for contactless measurement of hand tremor frequency. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, 8(1), pp. 69-75, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13119. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions