Alternative organization without vertical hierarchies of spatial scale?
Vertical hierarchies of spatial scale – where society in general, and organizations in particular, are differentiated into levels of spatial size – have often been criticized by those encouraging alternatives to capitalist organizing. These vertical scalings are said to promote authoritarianism, a monolithic capitalist economic system, uneven concentrations of social and organizational power and wealth, and ecologically destructive organizational growth. Consequently, so the argument goes, alternative organizing must scale horizontally whereby smaller organizations autonomously associate together into loose networks or federations. The aim of this contribution is to problematize such critiques of vertical hierarchies of scaling for alternative organization. To do so, I combine Management and Organization Studies (MOS) scholarship on scaling alternative organization with two theorisations of the politics of scale in human geography – namely those derived from Neo-Marxist Political Economy and Actor-Network Theories. My argument is that all those looking to understand and encourage the scaling of alternatives to capitalist organizing should engage with and not simply reject vertical scalar hierarchies.
History
School
- Loughborough Business School
Published in
OrganizationPublisher
SAGEVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
Users who receive access to an article through a repository are reminded that the article is protected by copyright and reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses. Users may also download and save a local copy of an article accessed in an institutional repository for the user's personal reference. For permission to reuse an article, please follow our Process for Requesting Permission: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/process-for-requesting-permissionAcceptance date
2024-10-03ISSN
1350-5084eISSN
1461-7323Publisher version
Language
- en