Loughborough University
Browse

Alternative quality control of steel fibre reinforced sprayed concrete (SFRSC)

Download (941.43 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-14, 14:12 authored by Isaac Galobardes, Cesar L. Silva, Antonio Figueiredo, Sergio Pialarissi-CavalaroSergio Pialarissi-Cavalaro, Chris GoodierChris Goodier

Steel fibre reinforced sprayed concrete (SFRSC) is used in applications with high structural capacity requirements. The quality control of SFRSC typically includes the assessment of toughness-related properties and measurement of the fibre content. The toughness may be measured with the beam test to EN 14488-3:2006, whereas the fibre content is generally measured by manual methods, such as collecting and weighing the fibres. Both procedures are time-consuming, difficult to perform and challenging to conduct with specimens extracted from the in-situ structure. These difficulties can therefore limit the frequency of characterization and hence potentially compromise the reliability of the information obtained, thus hindering the capacity of engineers to either detect potential problems or to optimize the material. The objective of this work therefore is to explore a simpler SFRSC quality control system that includes the inductive method for the assessment of fibre content and the Barcelona test for the assessment of toughness. Dry-mix SFRSC with five fibre contents were sprayed and tested with beam, Barcelona and inductive tests. Results confirm the greater sensitivity of the Barcelona test and the advantages of combining it with the inductive method for an enhanced quality control. Furthermore, equations are proposed to predict the beam test results using the Barcelona test results. These equations provide a good fit (R2 = 0.97) regardless of the fibre content in the mix, thus confirming the robustness of the approach both for the classification and for the quality control of SFRSC.

Funding

FAPESP

History

School

  • Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering

Published in

Construction and Building Materials

Volume

223

Pages

1008 - 1015

Publisher

Elsevier

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Rights holder

© Elsevier

Publisher statement

This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Construction and Building Materials and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.003

Acceptance date

2019-08-01

Publication date

2019-08-07

Copyright date

2019

ISSN

0950-0618

eISSN

1879-0526

Language

  • en

Depositor

Prof Chris Goodier. Deposit date: 13 August 2023

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC