A near-term strategy to reduce emissions from rail vehicles, as a path to full electrification for
maximal decarbonisation, is to partially electrify a route, with the remainder of the route
requiring an additional self-powered traction option. These rail vehicles are usually powered
by a diesel engine when not operating on electrified track and are referred to as bi-mode
vehicles.
This paper analyses the benefits of discontinuous electrification compared to continuous
electrification using the CO2 estimates from a validated high-fidelity bi-mode (diesel-electric)
rail vehicle model. This analysis shows that 50% discontinuous electrification provides a
maximum of 54% reduction in operational CO2 emissions when compared to the same length
of continuously electrified track. The highest emissions savings occurred when leaving train
stations where vehicles must accelerate quickly to line speed.
These results were used to develop a linear regression model for fast estimation of CO2
emissions from diesel running and electrification benefits. This model was able to estimate the
CO2 emissions from a route to within 10% of that given by the high-fidelity model.
Finally, additional considerations such as cost and the embodied CO2 in electrification
infrastructure were analysed to provide a comparison between continuous and discontinuous
electrification. Discontinuous electrification can cost up to 56% less per reduction in lifetime
emissions than continuous electrification and can save up to 2.3 times more lifetime CO2 per
distance electrified.
Funding
EPSRC’s DTE Network+ (EP/S032053/1)
RSSB (COF-IPS-02)
History
School
Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Springer under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/