posted on 2011-09-06, 11:43authored byRia Symonds, Duncan Lawson, Carol Robinson
In recent years, the failure rate on first year mathematics modules on Physics courses
at Loughborough University has given cause for concern. It was feared that failure in
the first year would result in students performing poorly in future mathematics
modules. Hence, a proactive support system was introduced for the mathematically
less well-prepared first year Physics students in October 2005. On completion of the
first mathematics module, this initiative showed some successful features in terms of
the results of the less well-prepared students. However, the use of qualitative research
methods revealed a difference in attitudes towards mathematics between the wellprepared
and less well-prepared students. This paper outlines the students’ attitudes
towards mathematics expressed through questionnaires and individual interviews. It
compares the well-prepared and less well-prepared students’ attitudes towards
mathematics prior to university and discusses the differences between the two
cohorts. The paper also examines how the introduction of a support system has
affected the students’ attitudes. A key outcome, in terms of the less well-prepared
students, is that the first semester experience was positive in terms of increasing
enjoyment of mathematics, but was negative in terms of feeling confident in
mathematics. Finally, the paper also analyses data taken from individual interviews
with some students on students’ learning approaches towards mathematics. These are
investigated closely and comparisons are again made between the well-prepared and
less well-prepared students. The analysis reveals that the less well-prepared students
failed to adapt their learning approach to one suitable for Higher Education.
History
School
Science
Department
Mathematics Education Centre
Citation
SYMONDS, R., LAWSON, D. and ROBINSON, C., 2010. An investigation of Physics undergraduates’ attitudes towards mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 29 (3), pp. 140-154