Loughborough University
Browse
Seino-Foster2021_Article_AnalysisOfTheFinalCommentsProv.pdf (955.91 kB)

Analysis of the final comments provided by a knowledgeable other in lesson study

Download (955.91 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-06-08, 08:01 authored by Tatsuhiko Seino, Colin FosterColin Foster
Lesson study has been implemented in schools around the world as a method of professional development for teachers. Lesson study consists of five steps, among which the “Research Lesson” and “Post-lesson Discussion” are central. During the Post-lesson Discussion, after the teacher has commented on the lesson, all of the observers discuss the lesson, and the “knowledgeable other” (koshi), a specially invited expert, provides final comments. The quality of these final comments is critical to the learning of the lesson-study participants, and, consequently, the koshi plays an extremely important role. However, few studies have examined the nature and structure of the final comments that koshis provide. This study analyzed the final comments made in three elementary-school research lessons in Japan by a highly distinguished university mathematics educator with considerable teaching experience and an outstanding reputation as a koshi. We found that his final comments clustered into seven categories, which we named: (1) considering the didactical value of mathematical content; (2) use of representations; (3) fostering positive attitudes to learning; (4) incorporating students’ ideas into whole-class discussions; (5) giving attention to what students write down; (6) giving attention to the content of the board-work; and (7) teacher growth through reflection. These categories provide insight into the nature of final comments that are regarded as being particularly useful and may form the basis for less-experienced koshis to structure their final comments in lesson study.

Funding

Exploring socially distributed professional knowledge for coherent curriculum design : ES/S014292/1

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (Grant Numbers JP16K21022, JP17K00956 and 24300268)

Economic and Social Research Council (Grant Number ES/S014292/1)

History

School

  • Science

Department

  • Mathematics Education Centre

Published in

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

Volume

24

Issue

5

Pages

507-528

Publisher

Springer (part of Springer Nature)

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The Authors

Publisher statement

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Acceptance date

2020-06-05

Publication date

2020-06-23

Copyright date

2020

ISSN

1386-4416

eISSN

1573-1820

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr Colin Foster. Deposit date: 5 June 2020

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC