Long-running multi-faceted intervention studies are particularly problematic in
large and complex organizations where traditional methods prove too resource
intensive and can yield inaccurate and incomplete findings. This paper
describes the first use of, longitudinal tracer methodology (LTM), a realist
approach to evaluation, to examine the links between multiple complex
intervention activities (intervention processes) and their outcomes on a
construction megaproject. LTM is especially useful when the researcher has
little control over intervention delivery but has access to evidence drawn from a
variety of sources to evaluate the effects of intervention activities over time.
There are, however, very few examples of how this methodology can be
successfully deployed in complex organisational settings and none on a
construction megaproject. In this paper we present a case study of its use over
a period of three years, on 24 construction sites forming London’s Thames
Tideway Tunnel (Tideway) megaproject. The aim of the study was to examine
the ‘transformational’ power of occupational safety and health (OSH)
interventions as they played out across the multiple organisations and supply
chains that constituted the megaproject. The case study shows how, with careful
design, the method can be adapted in-flight to accommodate shifting lines of
inquiry as the intervention activities progress and change. This feature of the
method, along with its resource efficient operation, make it a particularly
attractive option where interventions are likely to have differential effects
across multiple sites of enactment.
History
School
Business and Economics
Department
Business
Published in
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Citation
FULLER, P.A. ... et al., 2019. Applying a longitudinal tracer methodology to evaluate complex interventions in complex settings. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28 (4), pp.443-452.
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology on 22 April 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1598973.