Loughborough University
Browse

Assessment of protocol impact on subjectivity uncertainty when analyzing peripheral blood mononuclear cell flow cytometry data files

Download (1.5 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-03-31, 15:27 authored by Rebecca GrantRebecca Grant, Karen CoopmanKaren Coopman, Sandro Silva-Gomes, Jonathan Campbell, Bo Kara, Julian Braybrook, Jon PetzingJon Petzing
Measured variability of product within Cell and Gene Therapy (CGT) manufacturing arises from numerous sources across pre-analytical to post-analytical phases of testing. Operators are a function of the manufacturing process and are an important source of variability as a result of personal differences impacted by numerous factors. This re-search uses measurement uncertainty in comparison to Coefficient of Variation to quantify variation of participants when they complete Flow Cytometry data analysis through a 5-step gating sequence. Two study stages captured participants applying gates using their own judgement, and then following a diagrammatical protocol re-spectively. Measurement uncertainty was quantified for each participant (and analysis phase) by following Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement protocols, combining their standard deviations in quadrature from each gating step in the re-spective protocols. When participants followed a diagrammatical protocol, variation between participants reduced by 57 %, increasing confidence in a more uniform re-ported cell count percentage. Measurement uncertainty provided greater resolution to the analysis processes, identifying that most variability contributed in the Flow Cytom-etry gating process is from the very first gate, where isolating target cells from dead or dying cells is required. This work has demonstrated the potential for greater usage of measurement uncertainty within CGT manufacturing scenarios, due to the resolution it provides for root cause analysis and continuous improvement.

Funding

EPSRC/MRC Doctoral Training Centre for Regenerative Medicine at Loughborough University (EP/L105072/1)

GlaxoSmithKline

LGC

History

School

  • Aeronautical, Automotive, Chemical and Materials Engineering
  • Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering

Department

  • Chemical Engineering

Published in

Methods and Protocols

Volume

4

Issue

2

Publisher

MDPI

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The Authors

Publisher statement

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by MDPI under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

2021-03-28

Publication date

2021-03-30

Copyright date

2021

ISSN

2409-9279

eISSN

2409-9279

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr Jon Petzing. Deposit date: 29 March 2021

Article number

24

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC