- No file added yet -
Avoidance and aggregation create consistent egg distribution patterns of congeneric caddisflies across spatially variable oviposition landscapes
journal contribution
posted on 2020-11-13, 15:47 authored by Jill Lancaster, Barbara J Downes, Rebecca E Lester, Stephen Rice© 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Amongst oviparous animals, the spatial distribution of individuals is often set initially by where females lay eggs, with potential implications for populations and species coexistence. Do the spatial arrangements of oviposition sites or female behaviours determine spatial patterns of eggs? The consequences of spatial patterns may be context independent if strong behaviours drive patterns; context dependent if the local environment dominates. We tested these ideas using a guild of stream-dwelling caddisflies that oviposit on emergent rocks, focussing on genera with contrasting behaviours. In naturally occurring oviposition landscapes (riffles with emergent rocks), we surveyed the spatial arrangement and environmental characteristics of all emergent rocks, identified and enumerated egg masses on each. Multiple riffles were surveyed to test for spatially invariant patterns and behaviours. In landscapes, we tested for spatial clumping of oviposition sites exploited by each species and for segregation of congeneric species. At oviposition sites, we characterised the frequency distributions of egg masses and tested for species associations. Genus-specific behaviours produced different spatial patterns of egg masses in the same landscapes. Congregative behaviour of Ulmerochorema spp. at landscape scales and an aggregative response at preferred oviposition sites led to clumped patterns, local aggregation and species overlap. In contrast, avoidance behaviours by congeners of Apsilochorema resulted in no or weak clumping, and species segregation in some landscapes. Spatial patterns were consistent across riffles that varied in area and oviposition site density. These results suggest that quite different oviposition behaviours may be context independent, and the consequences of spatial patterns may be spatially invariant also.
Funding
Australian Research Council (DP 160102262)
History
School
- Social Sciences and Humanities
Department
- Geography and Environment
Published in
OecologiaVolume
192Issue
2Pages
375 - 389Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLCVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Rights holder
© SpringerPublisher statement
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Oecologia. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04587-7Acceptance date
2019-12-26Publication date
2020-01-14Copyright date
2020ISSN
0029-8549eISSN
1432-1939Publisher version
Language
- en
Depositor
Prof Stephen Rice Deposit date: 12 November 2020Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC