Blenkinsop, Pain and Hiley (2017).pdf (574.74 kB)
Balance control strategies during perturbed and unperturbed balance in standing and handstand
journal contribution
posted on 2017-09-18, 10:32 authored by Glen BlenkinsopGlen Blenkinsop, Matthew PainMatthew Pain, Michael HileyMichael Hiley© 2017 The Authors. Insights into sensorimotor control of balance were examined by the assessment of perturbed and unperturbed balance in standing and handstand postures. During perturbed and unperturbed balance in standing, the most prevalent control strategy was an ankle strategy, which was employed for more than 90% of the time in balance. During perturbed and unperturbed balance in handstand, the most prevalent control strategy was a wrist strategy, which was employed for more than 75% of the time in balance. In both postures, these strategies may be described as a single segment inverted pendulum control strategy, where the multi-segment system is controlled by torque about the most inferior joint with compensatory torques about all superior joints acting in the same direction to maintain a fixed orientation between superior segments. In contrast to previous literature, surprisingly little time was spent in a mixed strategy, representing less than 1% of time in standing balance and approximately 2% of time in handstand balance. Findings indicate that although the central nervous system may employ a number of control strategies during a trial, these strategies are employed individually rather than simultaneously.
History
School
- Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Published in
Royal Society Open ScienceVolume
4Issue
7Citation
BLENKINSOP, G.M., PAIN, M.T.G. and HILEY, M.J., 2017. Balance control strategies during perturbed and unperturbed balance in standing and handstand. Royal Society Open Science, 4: 161018.Publisher
© The Authors. Published by the The Royal Society.Version
- VoR (Version of Record)
Publisher statement
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/Acceptance date
2017-06-26Publication date
2017-07-26Copyright date
2017Notes
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Royal Society under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eISSN
2054-5703Publisher version
Language
- en