posted on 2015-09-18, 10:25authored byMark Freeman, Ben Groom, R.J. Zeckhauser
Climate science initially aspired to improve understanding of what the
future would bring, and thereby produce appropriate public policies and
effective international climate agreements. If that hope is dashed, as now
seems probable, effective policies for adapting to climate change become
critical. Climate science assumes new responsibilities by helping to foster
more appropriate adaptation measures, which might include shifting
modes or locales of production. This theoretical article focuses on two
broader tools: consumption smoothing in response to the risk of future
losses, and physical adaptation measures to reduce potential damages. It
shows that informative signals on the effects of climate change facilitate
better decisions on the use of each tool, thereby increasing social welfare.
History
School
Business and Economics
Department
Business
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Citation
FREEMAN, M.C., GROOM, B and ZECKHAUSER, R.J., 2015. Better predictions, better allocations: scientific advance and adaptation to climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 373:20150122.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publication date
2015
Notes
This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences and the definitive published version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0122