Loughborough University
Browse
- No file added yet -

Capturing protest in urban environments: The ‘police kettle’ as a territorial strategy

Download (304.74 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-03-21, 15:03 authored by Andrew Neal, Sven Opitz, Chris ZebrowskiChris Zebrowski
‘Kettling’ has emerged in recent decades as an established, if controversial, tactic of public order policing. Departing from a historical emphasis on dispersal, kettling instead acts to contain protesters within a police cordon for sustained periods of time. This article elaborates upon the spatial and temporal logics of kettling by investigating the conditions of is historical emergence. We argue that kettling should be understood as a territorial strategy that co-evolved in relation to forms of disruptive protest. Whereas techniques of crowd dispersal serve to diffuse a unified collective, ‘kettling’ aims to capture the volatile intensities of public dissent and exhaust its political energies. Drawing on police manuals, media coverage, accounts from activists and expert interviews, we show how the ‘kettle’ re-territorializes protest by acting on its spatio-temporal and affective constitution. By fabricating an inner outside of the urban milieu, freezing the time of collective mobilization and inducing debilitating affects such as fear and boredom, kettling intervenes into the scene of political subjectification that each congregation of protesting bodies seeks to fashion.

Funding

Our research for this article started as part of the International Collaboratory on Critical Methods in Security Studies (CCS) founded by the ESRC.

History

School

  • Social Sciences

Department

  • Politics and International Studies

Published in

Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

Volume

37

Issue

6

Pages

1045 - 1063

Citation

NEAL, A., OPITZ, S. and ZEBROWSKI, C.R., 2019. Capturing protest in urban environments: The ‘police kettle’ as a territorial strategy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37 (6), pp.1045-1063.

Publisher

SAGE Publications © The Author(s)

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Acceptance date

2019-03-11

Publication date

2019-04-12

Notes

This paper has been accepted for publication in the journal Environment and Planning D: Society and Space.

ISSN

0263-7758

eISSN

1472-3433

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC