Loughborough University
Browse
journal.pone.0258874.pdf (507.98 kB)

Cognitive performance in pain is predicted by effort, not goal desire

Download (507.98 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-02-16, 16:48 authored by Jayne Pickering, Nina Attridge, Matthew InglisMatthew Inglis

Background: Pain’s disruptive effects on cognition are well documented. The seminal goal-pursuit account of pain suggests that cognitive disruption is less likely if participants are motivated to attended to a focal goal and not a pain goal.

Objectives: Existing theory is unclear about the conceptualisation and operationalisation of ‘focal goal’. This study aims to clarify how goals should be conceptualised and further seeks to test the theory of the goal-pursuit account.

Methods: In a pre-registered laboratory experiment, 56 participants completed an arithmetic task in high-reward/low-reward and pain/control conditions. Pain was induced via cold-water immersion.

Results: High levels of reported effort exertion predicted cognitive-task performance, whereas desire for rewards did not. Post-hoc analyses further suggest that additional effort in the pain condition compensated for pain’s disruptive effects, but when this extra effort was not exerted, performance deficits were observed in pain, compared to control, conditions.

Conclusion: Results suggest that ‘motivation’, or commitment to a focal goal, is best understood as effort exertion and not as a positive desire to achieve a goal. These results solidify existing theory and aid researchers in operationalising these constructs.

History

School

  • Science

Department

  • Mathematics Education Centre

Published in

PLoS ONE

Volume

16

Issue

11

Publisher

Public Library of Science

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The Authors

Publisher statement

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Acceptance date

2021-10-06

Publication date

2021-11-04

Copyright date

2021

ISSN

1932-6203

eISSN

1932-6203

Language

  • en

Depositor

Prof Matthew Inglis. Deposit date: 16 February 2023

Article number

e0258874

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports