Combining machine learning with multi-physics modeling for multi-objective optimisation and techno-economic analysis of electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub> reduction process
posted on 2023-09-27, 12:51authored byLei Xing, Hai Jiang, Xingjian Tian, Huajie Yin, Weidong Shi, Eileen Yu, Valerie PinfieldValerie Pinfield, Jin Xuan
<p>As a carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technology, gas diffusion electrode (GDE) based electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub> reduction reaction (eCO<sub>2</sub>RR) can convert CO<sub>2</sub> to valuable products, such as formate and CO. However, the electrode parameters and operational conditions need to be studied and optimised to enhance the performance and reduce the net cost of the eCO<sub>2</sub>RR process before its industrial application. In this work, a machine learning algorithm, i.e., extended adaptive hybrid functions (E-AHF) is combined with a multi-physics model for the data-driven three-objective optimisation and techno-economic analysis of the GDE-based eCO<sub>2</sub>RR process. The effects of eight design variables on the product yield (PY), CO<sub>2</sub> conversion (CR) and specific electrical energy consumption (SEEC) of the process are analysed. The results show that the R<sup>2</sup> of the E-AHF model for the prediction of PY, CR and SEEC are all higher than 0.96, indicating the high accuracy of the developed machine learning algorithm for the prediction of the eCO<sub>2</sub>RR process. The process performance experiences a notable improvement after optimisation and is affected by a combination of eight variables, among which the electrolyte concentration having the most significant impact on PY and CR. The optimal trade-off single-pass PY, CR and SEEC are 3.25×10<sup>-9</sup> kg s<sup>-1</sup>, 0.663% and 9.95 kWh kg<sup>-1</sup> based on flow channels with 1 cm in length, respectively. The SEEC is reduced by nearly half and PY and CR are improved more than two times after optimisation. The production cost of the GDEbased eCO<sub>2</sub>RR process was approximately $378 t<sup>-1</sup>product (CO and formate), much lower than that of traditional CO<sub>2</sub> utilisation factories ($835 t<sup>-1</sup>product). The electricity cost accounted for more than 80% of the total cost, amounting to $318 t<sup>-1</sup>, indicating that cheaper and cleaner electricity sources would further reduce the production cost of the process, which is the key to the economics of this technology.</p>
Funding
Digital Circular Electrochemical Economy (DCEE)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council