2220-Article Text-2187-2-10-20201118.pdf (158.29 kB)
Coming to terms with dysfunctional hybridity: A conversation with Andrew Chadwick on the challenges to liberal democracy in the second-wave networked era
journal contribution
posted on 2020-03-20, 12:10 authored by Adrienne Russell, Andrew ChadwickAndrew ChadwickAndrew Chadwick’s view of today’s “hybrid media system,” as outlined first in his 2013 book of the same name, has moved scholars to understand how changes in politics are linked to changes in communication infrastructures and tools and to the ways people negotiate power in the networked media environment.
His work has provided readers with a blueprint to follow that moves focus beyond the usual categories of media and the usual sites of power. In this interview, conducted in November, 2019, Chadwick discusses what he calls “dysfunctional hybridity” and the urgency that kind of hybridity brings to the need to update our thinking about media, power and society.
His work has provided readers with a blueprint to follow that moves focus beyond the usual categories of media and the usual sites of power. In this interview, conducted in November, 2019, Chadwick discusses what he calls “dysfunctional hybridity” and the urgency that kind of hybridity brings to the need to update our thinking about media, power and society.
History
School
- Social Sciences and Humanities
Department
- Communication and Media
Published in
Studies in Communication SciencesVolume
20Issue
2Pages
211 - 225Publisher
Seismo VerlagVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Rights holder
© the AuthorsPublisher statement
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceptance date
2019-12-01Publication date
2020-03-16Copyright date
2020ISSN
1424-4896Publisher version
Language
- en