The catalytic performance of two types of catalysts, an ion-exchange resin, Purolite D5081 and an immobilised
enzyme, Novozyme 435, was compared for the esterification pretreatment of used cooking oil
(UCO) for the preparation of biodiesel. The reactions were carried out using a jacketed batch reactor with
a reflux condenser. The effect of mass transfer limitations was investigated and it was shown that internal
and external mass transfer limitations were negligible. An immobilised enzyme, Novozyme 435, was
investigated because it has been shown to give high free fatty acids (FFAs) conversion. This catalyst
has been compared to an ion-exchange resin, Purolite D5081, which was developed for the esterification
of UCO for the production of biodiesel. It was found that a conversion of 94% was achieved using Purolite
D5081 compared to 90% conversion with Novozyme 435. However, the optimum methanol to FFA ratio
for Purolite D5081 was 98:1 compared to 6.2:1 for Novozyme 435. In addition, it has been found that
with Novozyme 435 there are side reactions which result in the formation of additional fatty acid methyl
esters (FAMEs) and FFAs at longer reaction times.
Funding
We would like to thank EPSRC for the PhD scholarship to KH
and Universiti Malaysia Pahang and Malaysian Government for
the PhD scholarship to SZA. We would also like to thank Purolite
International Ltd. (Mr. Brian Windsor and the late Dr. Jim Dale)
for supplying the ion-exchange catalyst, GreenFuel Oil Co. Ltd.,
UK for supplying the UCO and Novozymes UK. Ltd. for supplying
the enzyme catalyst ((Dr. David Cowan) for his help and advice
with using Novozyme 435 for this project).
History
School
Aeronautical, Automotive, Chemical and Materials Engineering
Department
Chemical Engineering
Citation
HAIGH, K.F. ... et al., 2013. Comparison of Novozyme 435 and Purolite D5081 as heterogeneous catalysts for the pretreatment of used cooking oil for biodiesel production. Fuel, 111, pp.186-193.