The goal of this article is to reflect on the conceptions of sociology that underpin
some of the most interesting perspectives in what can be referred to contemporary
constitutional sociology. Although it is not a unified program, its general orientation
can be defined as an attempt to enquiry into the transformation of processes and
structures with constitutional reach in contemporary modernity. The article begins
by discussing the disciplinary claim that in my view is central to contemporary
constitutional sociology and then compares it with the main aspects of the idea of
philosophical sociology on which this author has been working in the past few years.
I then discuss three main aspects that are key for both approaches: the problem
of methodological nationalism, the foundation of their claim to universalism and,
finally, the tension between descriptive and normative claims.
Funding
Este artículo forma parte de las actividades
de investigación del proyecto Conicyt-Redes 130008.
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published in
Econmia y Sociedad
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
105 - 134 (29)
Citation
CHERNILO, D., 2014. Concepciones de sociologia en la sociologia constitucional contemporanea. Economia Y Politica, 1 (2), pp. 101-129
Publisher
Universidad Adolfo Ibanez Escuela de Gobierno
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Publisher statement
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publication date
2014
Notes
This article is written in Spanish and published in the journal, Economia Y Politica. It is also available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.15691/07194714.2014.008