JGR Biogeosciences - 2022 - Bullard - Cyanobacterial Soil Crust Responses to Rainfall and Effects on Wind Erosion in a.pdf (2.61 MB)
Download file

Cyanobacterial soil crust responses to rainfall and effects on wind erosion in a semiarid environment, Australia: implications for landscape stability

Download (2.61 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 31.01.2022, 14:29 by Joanna BullardJoanna Bullard, CL Strong, HAP Aubault
Cyanobacterial biocrusts (CBCs) perform a range of functions including early successional colonization of substrates, modification of soil properties, surface stabilization and carbon sequestration. The response of CBCs to hydration is well-constrained for cultured or single-species but less so for in situ communities and there are few studies of CBC response to, and impact on, wind erosion. This paper investigates the in situ response of dryland CBCs to rainfall and wind erosion using biological and physical indicators. Field sites are in central Australia in three geomorphic situations - sand dune, nebkha and claypan. Results indicate higher amounts of rainfall trigger a more intense biological response than lower amounts, but not one of longer duration. The intensity of photosynthetic response to rainfall appears related to air temperature. The relationship between CBC and soil loss by wind erosion is inconclusive, but saltation efficiency (Qs/Q) is highest on the dune and claypan when tested 48 hr after applying 5 mm of rainfall. This is attributed to rainfall detachment of sand particles increasing the availability of loose erodible material on the surface. The results highlight the rapid biological response of CBCs to rainfall events (within hours), and the importance of overall environmental conditions, such as air temperature, but raise questions as to the longevity of the biological impact of such response. Drought-affected CBCs can protect the surface against wind erosion but dehydration may reduce resilience to disturbance and, under predicted future climate scenarios, the protective role of cyanobacterial crusts may be compromised.

Plain Language Summary
Biological crusts comprise one or more of cyanobacteria, fungi, algae, lichen and mosses. They are tolerant to high temperatures and long periods of drought and can bind soil particles together making them less susceptible to erosion. This paper examines how cyanobacteria-dominated soil crusts respond to rainfall and whether that response affects the likelihood of wind erosion. We used a rainfall simulator and a wind tunnel and conducted experiments on a sand dune, the area between the dune and a floodplain, and the floodplain itself. We examined changes in the biological and physical characteristics of the cyanobacterial crust for no rain, 5 mm rain and 10 mm rain. Higher amounts of rainfall led to more biological change than lower amounts. The wind is most effective following 5 mm rain probably because the rain causes sand particles to come to the surface and when the wind blows these particles they impact other particles causing erosion. Cyanobacterial crusts react quickly to rainfall but the response does not last long (less than a day). Drought affected cyanobacterial crusts can protect the surface against wind erosion but this ability may be reduced if future climate conditions are warmer with longer periods between rain.

Funding

UK Natural Environment Research Council. Grant Number: NE/K011461/1

Department of Environment and Heritage Protection. Grant Number: WITK15785115

History

School

  • Social Sciences and Humanities

Department

  • Geography and Environment

Published in

Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

Volume

127

Issue

2

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Version

VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The Authors

Publisher statement

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

14/01/2022

Publication date

2022-01-28

Copyright date

2022

ISSN

2169-8953

eISSN

2169-8961

Language

en

Depositor

Prof Joanna Bullard. Deposit date: 31 January 2022

Article number

e2021JG006652