00213624.2021.pdf (485.04 kB)
Download fileDebating the future of heterodox economics
journal contribution
posted on 2021-10-27, 13:09 authored by Geoff HodgsonThis essay is a reply to five reviews (by Lynne Chester, David Dequech, John Henry, Marc Lavoie, and Jason Potts) of Is there a Future for Heterodox Economics? (by Geoffrey Hodgson). It welcomes the debate that has emerged on the nature and future of heterodox economics. The essay revisits the problem of defining heterodox (and orthodox) economics. The relationships between orthodox and heterodox economics and political ideology are discussed, especially in relation to different normative views on markets. The essay also points to the need for understanding how scientific disciplines are organized, particularly to inform discussions of strategy by heterodox economists.
History
School
- Loughborough University London
Published in
Journal of Economic IssuesVolume
55Issue
3Pages
603 - 614Publisher
Taylor & Francis (Routledge)Version
- VoR (Version of Record)
Rights holder
© The AuthorPublisher statement
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Taylor & Francis under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceptance date
2021-04-02Publication date
2021-10-15Copyright date
2021ISSN
0021-3624eISSN
1946-326XPublisher version
Language
- en