File(s) under embargo
Reason: Publisher requirement.
11
month(s)8
day(s)until file(s) become available
Different strategies for landing from different heights among people with chronic ankle instability
Background
Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) usually occurs during landing from heights among people with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Although the kinematics when landing on the flat surface has been reported, no studies have explored the effect of different heights on the landing strategies using a trapdoor device among people with CAI.
Research question
Do people with CAI adopt different landing strategies when drop-landing on the trapdoor device from three heights?
Methods
Thirty-one participants with CAI (24 males and 7 females, age=21.1±1.8 years, height=176.9±7.4 cm, body mass=71.9±9.2 kg, injured side=18 R&13 L) were recruited. They dropped from three different heights (low height (16 cm), medium height (23 cm), high height (30 cm)) with their affected foot landing on a movable surface of a trapdoor device, which was tilted 24° inward and 15° forward to simulate LAS. Kinematic data was collected using a twelve-camera motion capture system. One-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to compare the differences between the three heights.
Results
Significant height effects were detected in the peak ankle inversion angle (p=0.009, η2p=0.280) and angular velocity (p<0.001, η2p=0.444), and the peak ankle plantarflexion (p=0.002, η2p=0.360), knee flexion (p<0.001, η2p=0.555), and hip flexion (p=0.030, η2p=0.215) angles at the time of peak ankle inversion. Post-hoc tests showed that all the angles and velocities were higher at a low height than at medium (p: 0.001–0.045, d: 0.14–0.44) and high heights (p: 0.001–0.023, d: 0.28–0.66), except for the ankle plantarflexion angle, which was lower at a low height than at medium (p<0.001, d=0.44) and high (p=0.021, d=0.38) heights.
Significance
People with CAI adopt a protective strategy during drop-landing at medium and high heights compared to a low height. This strategy involves increased ankle dorsiflexion angle as well as knee and hip flexion angles.
Funding
General Administration of Sport of China [grant number 23QN009]
National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number No. 12102235]
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [grant number ZR2022MH163]
History
School
- Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Published in
Gait & PostureVolume
114Issue
2024Pages
90 - 94Publisher
ElsevierVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Rights holder
© ElsevierPublisher statement
This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceptance date
2024-09-13Publication date
2024-09-15Copyright date
2024ISSN
0966-6362eISSN
1879-2219Publisher version
Language
- en