Perera2021_Article_DifferentialEffectsOfMinifiedA.pdf (646.91 kB)
Differential effects of minified and magnified mirror visual feedback on the underlying misperception of hand size
journal contribution
posted on 2021-04-19, 11:21 authored by Treshi-Marie Perera, Jiun Ting Tan, Poo Shin Mu, Roger NewportRoger NewportPerception of the size of body parts, for instance the hand, has been shown to be distorted in healthy participants, with over- and under-estimations of width and length respectively. Illusory manipulations of body shape and size have highlighted the flexibility of the body representation and have also been found to update immediate perceptions of body size and surrounding objects. Here, we examined whether underlying misperceptions of hand width and length can be modified through exposure to illusory changes in hand size using a mirror visual feedback (MVF) paradigm. While questionnaire responses indicated subjective susceptibility to both magnified and minified to minifying mirrors. These variations might reflect differences in the way that stored representations are accessed or updated in response to size manipulations. Secondly the findings further reinforce differences between subjective and objective outcomes of illusions on subsequent body perception.
History
School
- Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Published in
Attention, Perception, and PsychophysicsVolume
83Pages
2281-2290Publisher
SpringerVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Rights holder
© The AuthorsPublisher statement
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Springer under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Acceptance date
2021-01-25Publication date
2021-03-22Copyright date
2021ISSN
1943-3921eISSN
1943-393XPublisher version
Language
- en