Disciplinarity and the application of social research response
journal contributionposted on 2014-06-25, 13:15 authored by Jonathan Potter
This response to Corcoran (2010) and Abell and Walton (2010) is organized around four key issues. 1. Disciplinarity: against a focus on the standard disciplinary boundaries of social psychology, and the conventional qualitative/quantitative division, it highlights meta-theoretical, theoretical and empirical disagreement over the object of analysis. 2. Social cognition: doubts about a suggested overlap between the concerns and methods of social cognition and discursive psychology are outlined. 3. Naturalistic data: the virtues of working with records of people living their lives outside of the narrow situations got up by social researchers are reiterated. 4. Application: the applied success of discursive psychological research is illustrated.
- Social Sciences
- Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published inBRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Pages691 - 701 (11)
CitationPOTTER, J., 2010. Disciplinarity and the application of social research response. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49 (4), pp.691-701.
PublisherWiley-Blackwell (© The British Psychological Society)
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
NotesThis is the peer reviewed version of the article which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466610X535946. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.