posted on 2015-02-11, 15:07authored byKarina Nielsen, Raymond Randall, Karl B. Christensen
A mixed methods approach was applied to examine the effects of a naturally occurring teamwork implementation supported with training. The first objective was to integrate qualitative process evaluation and quantitative effect evaluation to examine how and why the training influence intervention outcomes. The intervention (N = 328) was supplemented with four training conditions (no training, team member training, team leader training and a combination of training types). The second objective was to examine whether different training conditions support team member training in isolation, but not in combination, led to positive outcomes. The integrated analysis of qualitative and quantitative data indicated that a number of contextual factors interacted with training experiences and outcomes to influence the success of team implementation.
History
School
Business and Economics
Department
Business
Published in
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Volume
Forthcoming
Issue
1
Pages
1 - 48 (48)
Citation
NIELSON, K., RANDALL, R. and CHRISTENSEN, K.B., 2017. Do different training conditions facilitate team implementation? A quasi-experimental mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), pp.223-247.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publication date
2017
Notes
This is the accepted version of a paper subsequently published in the serial, Journal of Mixed Methods Research. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558689815589050