lppaper - final.pdf (87.75 kB)
Download file

Documentation for institutional repositories

Download (87.75 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 09.02.2006, 12:44 by Stephen Probets, Celia Jenkins
In order to identify best practice, the documentation of seven academic institutional repositories(IRs) was compared and contrasted. This was followed by semi-structured interviews with six practitioners experienced in the set-up, management and maintenance of IRs, including representatives of three JISC FAIR projects. The aim was to identify the requirements of policy documentation provided by IRs. Although many issues were found to be handled differently depending on what IR software was used, or the stage of development of the IR, several common factors emerged. These included the importance of developing the documentation in collaboration with individual academics, departments and senior management whose views and needs are central to the success of the IR. Additional findings were that policies should be formulated only when the purpose and aims of the IR have been clearly defined and that the IR documentation itself should be concise and easy to understand, with the rights and responsibilities of stakeholders clearly presented.

History

School

  • Science

Department

  • Information Science

Pages

89851 bytes

Citation

PROBETS, S. and JENKINS, C., 2006. Documentation for institutional repositories. Learned Publishing, 19(1), pp. 57-71

Publisher

Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers / © Steve Probets and Celia Jenkins

Publication date

2006

Notes

This article has been published in the journal, Learned Publishing [© ALPSP]. The definitive version: PROBETS, S. and JENKINS, C., 2006. Documentation for institutional repositories. Learned Publishing, 19(1), pp. 57-71 is available at: http://www.alpsp.org/journal.htm.

ISSN

1741-4857;0953-1513

Language

en