posted on 2018-10-16, 15:08authored byMichiel Van Meeteren, David Bassens, Ben Derudder
By way of rejoinder to commentaries by members of the invisible college of postcolonial urbanism, we further develop issues of praxis regarding engaged pluralism and plead for its usefulness. Engaged pluralism when doing global urban studies depends on a research culture where both deconstructive and reconstructive moments are encouraged. Deconstruction benefits from the provincialization of all knowledge. Reconstruction can occur when we bracket ontological and epistemological incommensurability and focus on the cognitively enriching research praxis of frame switching, where research perspectives constitute nonexclusive, temporary, or alternating entries for research.
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Geography and Environment
Published in
Dialogues in Human Geography
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
296 - 301
Citation
VAN MEETEREN, M., BASSENS, D. and DERUDDER, B., 2016. Doing global urban studies: On the need for engaged pluralism, frame switching, and methodological cross-fertilization. Dialogues in Human Geography, 6 (3), pp.296-301.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Acceptance date
2016-11-01
Publication date
2016-11-01
Notes
This paper was published in the journal Dialogues in Human Geography and the definitive published version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820616676653.