Backsourcing Paper _ R2 Final.pdf (259.53 kB)

East, west, would home really be best? On dissatisfaction with offshore-outsourcing and firms' inclination to backsource

Download (259.53 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 27.09.2019, 13:18 by Ilan Oshri, Jatinder S. Sidhu, Julia Kotlarsky
With so many firms seemingly disenchanted with their experiences of offshore outsourcing one may well wonder why relatively few of these firms choose to ‘backsource’ – i.e., bring their offshored operations back in-house. Of all sourcing decisions that firms take, backsourcing is perhaps the least understood and least researched. In this article we draw on the behavioral theory of the firm (BTF) to propose a new model in which differences in firms' inclination to backsource are ascribed to the level of dissatisfaction at not having achieved offshoring aspirations. Building on BTF concepts of bounded rationality, problemistic search and satisficing decisions, the model suggests that how this dissatisfaction with offshoring affects a firm's inclination to backsource is dependent on managerial expectations regarding the technical challenges of reintegrating activities and the possible financial losses and decline in quality following backsourcing, as well as on internal political support and financial slack for backsourcing. SEM analysis of data from U.S. and U.K. firms shows support for the model. The study highlights the importance of recognizing the role of managerial perceptions and biases and subgroup political relations in shaping firms' backsourcing behaviors. We also discuss the study's contributions to research and practice.

History

School

  • Business and Economics

Department

  • Business

Published in

Journal of Business Research

Volume

103

Issue

October 2019

Pages

644 - 653

Citation

OSHRI, I., SIDHU, J.S. and KOTLARSKY, J., 2017. East, west, would home really be best? On dissatisfaction with offshore-outsourcing and firms' inclination to backsource. Journal of Business Research, 103 (October 2019), pp.644-653.

Publisher

© Elsevier

Version

AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Acceptance date

07/11/2017

Publication date

2017-11-11

Notes

This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Journal of Business Research and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.008.

ISSN

0148-2963

Language

en

Exports