Loughborough University
Browse
Effectiveness of an intervention for reducing sitting time and improving health in office workers- three arm cluster randomised controlled trial.pdf (1.12 MB)

Effectiveness of an intervention for reducing sitting time and improving health in office workers: three arm cluster randomised controlled trial

Download (1.12 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-08-24, 10:21 authored by Charlotte L Edwardson, Stuart JH Biddle, Stacy ClemesStacy Clemes, Melanie J Davies, David W Dunstan, Helen Eborall, Malcolm H Granat, Laura J Gray, Genevieve N Healy, Nishal Bhupendra Jaicim, Sarah Lawton, Benjamin D Maylor, Fehmidah MunirFehmidah Munir, Gerry Richardson, Thomas Yates, Alexandra M Clarke-Cornwell

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention, with and without a height adjustable desk, on daily sitting time, and to investigate the relative effectiveness of the two interventions, and the effectiveness of both interventions on physical behaviours and physical, biochemical, psychological, and work related health and performance outcomes. 

Design: Cluster three arm randomised controlled trial with follow-up at three and 12 months. 

Setting: Local government councils in Leicester, Liverpool, and Greater Manchester, UK. 

Participants: 78 clusters including 756 desk based employees in defined offices, departments, or teams from two councils in Leicester, three in Greater Manchester, and one in Liverpool. 

Interventions: Clusters were randomised to one of three conditions: the SMART Work and Life (SWAL) intervention, the SWAL intervention with a height adjustable desk (SWAL plus desk), or control (usual practice). 

Main outcomes measures: The primary outcome measure was daily sitting time, assessed by accelerometry, at 12 month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were accelerometer assessed sitting, prolonged sitting, standing and stepping time, and physical activity calculated over any valid day, work hours, workdays, and non-workdays, self-reported lifestyle behaviours, musculoskeletal problems, cardiometabolic health markers, work related health and performance, fatigue, and psychological measures. 

Results: Mean age of participants was 44.7 years, 72.4% (n=547) were women, and 74.9% (n=566) were white. Daily sitting time at 12 months was significantly lower in the intervention groups (SWAL −22.2 min/day, 95% confidence interval −38.8 to −5.7 min/day, P=0.003; SWAL plus desk −63.7 min/day, −80.1 to −47.4 min/day, P<0.001) compared with the control group. The SWAL plus desk intervention was found to be more effective than SWAL at changing sitting time (−41.7 min/day, −56.3 to −27.0 min/day, P<0.001). Favourable differences in sitting and prolonged sitting time at three and 12 month follow-ups for both intervention groups and for standing time for the SWAL plus desk group were observed during work hours and on workdays. Both intervention groups were associated with small improvements in stress, wellbeing, and vigour, and the SWAL plus desk group was associated with improvements in pain in the lower extremity, social norms for sitting and standing at work, and support. 

Conclusions: Both SWAL and SWAL plus desk were associated with a reduction in sitting time, although the addition of a height adjustable desk was found to be threefold more effective. 

Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN11618007.

Funding

University of Leicester

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) public health research programme (project No PRR5-0213-25004)

Leicester Clinical Trials Unit and the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, which is a partnership between University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Loughborough University, and the University of Leicester.

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Published in

The BMJ

Volume

378

Issue

8349

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© BMJ Publishing Group

Publisher statement

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by BMJ Publishing Group under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

2022-06-13

Publication date

2022-08-17

Copyright date

2022

eISSN

1756-1833

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr Stacy Clemes. Deposit date: 23 August 2022

Article number

e069288

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC