posted on 2024-04-12, 15:56authored byCamille Marcantei, Alexis Couret, James KingJames King, Simon Mazeaud, Abergel Armand, Gael Ennequin
<p><strong>Background & Aims:</strong> Decreased muscle mass and physical function are common complications in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients which are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Thus, there have been targeted efforts to prevent and/or improve both by enrolling these patients in exercise training programs. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the effects of exercise training on muscle mass and physical function in people with HCC after diagnosis.</p>
<p><strong>Methods:</strong> A systematic literature search was conducted using the Medline, Base, PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus, and trial registries, through April 2023 for studies that assessed the effects of an exercise training program in adults with HCC. The primary outcomes were muscle mass and physical function. To assess the risk of bias, we used the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies from the Effective Public Health Practice Project.</p>
<p><strong>Results:</strong> Eight studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 809 participants. Interventions included aerobic exercise training, resistance exercise training, balance and flexibility training, or home-based exercise training. Four studies showed statistically significant improvements in at least one muscular outcome. Three studies showed a maintenance of muscular outcomes, and one a decrease in muscle mass. Four articles showed statistically improvements in at least one physical fitness variable, two showed a maintenance of physical function variable.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Together the results suggest that patients may benefit from physical exercise training after treatment to improve muscle mass and physical function.</p>
Funding
Ligue contre le Cancer (comité Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes et Saône-et-Loire)
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08441-6