Effects of frequency and duration of interrupting sitting on cardiometabolic risk markers
journal contributionposted on 06.08.2019, 11:04 by Benjamin Maylor, Julia Zakrzewski-Fruer, David StenselDavid Stensel, Charlie Orton, Daniel Bailey
Introduction Interrupting prolonged sitting with multiple bouts of moderate-intensity physical activity (PA) can improve postprandial cardiometabolic risk markers. This study examined the effect of high and low frequency PA bouts (matched for total PA duration and energy expenditure) on postprandial cardiometabolic responses when compared with prolonged sitting. Methods In this three-condition randomised crossover trial, fourteen sedentary, inactive females (33.8±13.4 years, BMI 27.1±6.3 kg/m2 ) completed three, 7.5 h conditions: 1) prolonged sitting (SIT), 2) high-frequency PA breaks (HIGH-FREQ) consisting of 15 x 2 min bouts of moderate-intensity treadmill PA every 30 min, and 3) low-frequency PA breaks (LOW FREQ) consisting of 3 x 10 min bouts of moderate-intensity treadmill PA every 180 min. The PA bouts were performed at 65% of peak oxygen uptake. Net incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for each 7.5 h condition was calculated for glucose, insulin and triacylglycerol (TAG) concentrations. Results Insulin iAUC was significantly (p<0.026) lower during HIGH FREQ (mean [95%CI]; 82.86 [55.02, 110.70] µU/mL∙7.5h) than LOW-FREQ (116.61 [88.50, 144.73]) and SIT (119.98 [92.42, 147.53]). Glucose and TAG iAUC did not differ between conditions. Conclusions Engaging in higher-frequency PA breaks may be effective in attenuating postprandial insulin responses compared with lower-frequency PA breaks and prolonged sitting.
- Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences