File(s) under permanent embargo

Reason: This item is currently closed access.

Employee perceptions of empowerment

journal contribution
posted on 26.06.2014, 11:27 by Kay Greasley, Alan Bryman, Andrew R.J. Dainty, Andrew Price, Robby SoetantoRobby Soetanto, Nicola King
Purpose – This study aims to examine how empowerment is perceived by individuals employed on construction projects. In contrast with previous research which has predominantly been conducted from a management perspective, this paper deals with employee perceptions of empowerment. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative approach was adopted for this study employing in-depth interviews on four major construction projects. Findings – The findings from the study indicate that there can be a gap between the employee experience and the management rhetoric. Health and Safety issues were often cited by the employees as a major barrier to empowerment. The strict Health and Safety regulations under which construction employees operate limit their freedom to influence the work that they undertake. A further factor that was found to have a strong influence on the diffusion of empowerment was the role of the employees’ immediate supervisor. Research limitations/implications – The data are based on case studies that illuminate our understanding of empowerment in relation to construction projects. This area of research would benefit from alternative research approaches that could establish the generalizability of the findings reported. Originality/value – This article explores the notion that, as empowerment is a perception, management cannot easily regulate employees’ empowerment. This emphasises the importance of exploring employee perspectives when examining employee empowerment and its impact on workplace relations.

Funding

Employee participation, Empowerment, Construction operations

History

School

  • Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering

Citation

GREASLEY, K. ...et al., 2005. Employee perceptions of empowerment. Employee Relations, 27 (4), pp. 354 - 368.

Publisher

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Version

VoR (Version of Record)

Publication date

2005

Notes

Closed access

ISSN

0142-5455

Language

en