File(s) under permanent embargo
Reason: This item is currently closed access.
Evaluating an alternative draft pick allocation policy to reduce ‘tanking’ in the Australian Football League
journal contributionposted on 2018-04-09, 12:13 authored by Liam J. Lenten, Aaron SmithAaron Smith, Noel Boys
This article considers an adjustment to the method of determining the order of draft picks in the Australian Football League (AFL). Rather than pure reverse order based on the end-of-season ladder (standings), an alternative draft-pick allocation (henceforth called ‘ADPA’) policy is proposed and evaluated. It holds that the draft-pick order rule shall give the top pick the team eliminated first (i.e. after fewest matches played) from the finals series (playoffs), and the remainder in order of elimination. Employing a quasi-natural experiment using data obtained from a sample of 2288 regular-season games from 1997 to 2009, the ADPA policy produced an estimated 21.7% improvement in an already-eliminated team's probability of winning late-season matches. A review of the business case underpinning the ADPA reveals a series of benefits for the AFL. In addition to improving fans’ late-season engagement, the policy would offer a fairer system of draft distributions that would augment league equalisation and enhance the AFL's integrity principles.
- Loughborough University London
Published inEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Pages315 - 320
CitationLENTEN, L.J., SMITH, A.C. and BOYS, N., 2017. Evaluating an alternative draft pick allocation policy to reduce ‘tanking’ in the Australian Football League. European Journal of Operational Research, 267 (1), pp.315-320.
- VoR (Version of Record)
Publisher statementThis paper was accepted for publication in the journal European Journal of Operational Research and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.029.
NotesThis paper is closed access.