Even patients with very chronic symptoms of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) may report improvements following radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (rESWT), but no single baseline factor predicts response
Objective. Do any measures at baseline predict response from radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (rESWT) for patients with GTPS?
Methods. Setting: single UK NHS Sports Medicine Clinic. Patients: 260 patients following rESWT for GTPS. Mean age 60.0 ± 11.9 years, 81% female, mean duration of symptoms 44.5 ± 44.7 months (range: 3 months-20years). Interventions: participants received three sessions of rESWT plus structured home exercise programme (flexibility, strength, and balance). Main outcome measures: follow-up was 3-months, and 6-months. Outcome measures of self-reported “average pain”, “worst pain”, and VISA-G score. Baseline PROMS (Non-Arthritic Hip score, and Oxford Hip Score), pain (painDETECT, S-LANSS, CSI), “ability” (ODI, MSK-HQ), mood (HADS).
Results. Improvement in “average pain” of 30% at 3-months, and 37% at 6-months. VISA-G improved by more than 10% points at 3-months and 6-months. Several weak or very-weak correlations were identified, but no single baseline variable corelated strongly to the improvements seen at follow-up time-points.
Conclusions. There were clinical and statistically-significant improvements seen following rESWT for patients with GTPS, even in those with very long duration of symptoms, irrespective of age or symptom duration. There was a statistically significant difference for gender (greater benefit in female patients) which did not reach clinical significance. Greatest improvements in self-reported pain were seen in those with the worst baseline symptoms, particularly with variables more sensitive to non-arthritic hip pain (NAHS, VISA-G) than “arthritic pain” measures (OHS). Baseline measures such as Oswestry Disability Inventory or the MSK-HQ have weak correlations to improvements in some factors seen, with fewer correlations seen for markers of chronic, neuropathic, or centralised pain, or mood.
History
School
- Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Published in
Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons JournalVolume
12Issue
3Pages
411 - 421Publisher
Edra SpAVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Rights holder
© Italian Society Of Muscles Ligaments & Tendons - I.S.Mu.L.TPublisher statement
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in MLTJ - Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in MLTJ - Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal 12(3), 2022, https://doi.org/10.32098/mltj.03.2022.17Acceptance date
2022-05-09Publication date
2022-07-01Copyright date
2022eISSN
2240-4554Publisher version
Language
- en