posted on 2022-02-17, 10:05authored bySam Thrower, Magnus HamannMagnus Hamann, Elizabeth Stokoe, Chris Harwood
Research exploring the processes and effects of parent-child social interaction in youth sport has
been limited by an overreliance on retrospective questionnaire and interview-based designs. The
purpose of the current study was to examine the naturally occurring parent-child interactions
which unfold during the pre-competition car journey within British tennis. Specifically, the
research questions focused on identifying the parental communicative practices that enabled (or
limited) affiliative conversations about children’s upcoming tennis performance. Audio and
video recordings were made of 13 parent-child dyads resulting in 4 hours 45 minutes of parent?child interactions. These recordings were transcribed using the Jefferson (2004) system for
capturing the production, pace, and organisation of social interaction. Conversation analysis
revealed that children resisted or disengaged from the interaction when parents positioned
themselves as having authority over, and entitlement to know about, the child’s upcoming
performance. This positioning was achieved through giving instructions or advice about the
child’s performance and through asking ‘test’ questions to which they already knew the answer.
However, asking ‘wh-questions’ that enabled children to talk about their own areas to focus on,
lead to extended sequences of affiliative talk. From an applied perspective, these findings
highlight the importance of asking genuinely open questions that construct the child as having
ownership of their tennis development and performances.
This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Psychology of Sport and Exercise and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102166.