Over the past two decades, policy-makers have been encouraged to develop evidence-based policies in collaboration with experts. Drug policy is unique since it has an established inbuilt mechanism for soliciting expertise via the Advisory Council for the Misuse of Drugs. Increasingly alternative mechanisms have been used. Based upon detailed analysis of
two case studies of drug policy-making using alternative methods to solicit expertise, we argue that the framing of the policy problem, the mechanisms used to involve experts and the type of evidence actively
sought have continued to marginalise the involvement of the drug user in policy-making.
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published in
The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
422-441
Citation
MONAGHAN, M.P., WINCUP, E. and WICKER, K., 2018. Experts, expertise and drug policy-making. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 57 (3), pp.422-441.
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: MONAGHAN, M.P., WINCUP, E. and WICKER, K., 2018. Experts, expertise and drug policy-making. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 57 (3), pp.422-441, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12265. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions."