posted on 2006-07-06, 12:17authored byHoward G. Denton, Michael Gary Thomas
This paper describes a case study carried out to establish a group of low
ability and disaffected pupils’ perception of the term “relevance” with particular
reference to design and technology. Discussion of the relationship between
pupils’ perceived relevance of an activity and their levels of engagement has
appeared on the UK educational agenda, (Ofsted 2005:51-52, Davies et al,
2004:147, Daniels et al 1998:5.5, Denton, 1992), but not with the frequency
which might be expected. Initial research suggested that pupils at this school
had a very positive perception of the ‘relevance’ of design and technology. In
contrast the literature reviewed suggested that pupils in their samples had a
low perception of the ‘relevance‘ of design and technology. The findings
suggest a dual understanding of “relevance”: in terms of present / situational
and in terms of preparation for a particular purpose. The group of pupils in this
research perceived ‘relevance’ more in terms of present / situational, and the
implications of this finding for educational practitioners and other stakeholders
is discussed.
History
School
Design
Pages
90173 bytes
Citation
DENTON, H.G. and THOMAS, M.G., 2006. Exploring low ability and disaffected pupils' perception of relevance of design and technology : a case study with a group of pupils aged 14-16. Design and Technology Education : An International Journal, 11(1), pp. 45-58