Loughborough University
Browse
Factors affecting the slump and strength development of geopolymer concrete.pdf (712.83 kB)

Factors affecting the slump and strength development of geopolymer concrete

Download (712.83 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-09-17, 13:58 authored by Thanh NguyenThanh Nguyen, Chris GoodierChris Goodier, Simon Austin
Cement production is estimated to be responsible for 5–8% of global total carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Geopolymer concrete (GC) is claimed to release up to 45% less CO2 for a comparable concrete, but is more difficult to manufacture. This study investigated the effect of factors other than mix design on the slump and strength development of GC produced from low-calcium fly ash (FA) and up to 50% ground granulated blastfurnace slag (GGBS) replacement; these were: curing methods and temperatures (at 10, 20 and 75 °C); FA fineness; superplasticiser type; water content; and GGBS/FA ratio. Methods are also presented for the volume-to-mass conversion of sodium hydroxide at a specific molarity and ambient temperature, and an effective combination of wax-based mixtures as mould agents to overcome the inherent manufacturing mould release difficulties. Steam-curing improved the compressive strength of the FA-based GC over oven drying by up to 20%, as did increasing the FA fineness (although this became negligible with 50% GGBS replacement). Both naphthalene and polycarboxylate superplasticizers improved the slump of GC (from 110 to 210 mm) without significantly reducing the compressive strength (less than 5 MPa). Water content of GC had a great effect on the slump, but less so on the compressive strength. Increasing the GGBS content gradually decreased the slump but rapidly increased the strength, regardless of the curing temperatures of 20 or 75 °C. The GC with the minimum of 20% GGBS replacement achieved 33 MPa after 28 days curing at 10 °C. Air-dry curing provided a greater strength development of FA-based GC than water curing, though the opposite was observed for the 50/50 GGBS/FA GC. Consideration of these factors can significantly ease the manufacture of GC, enhancing its potential application in real structures, and consequently helping reduce global (CO2) emissions.

History

School

  • Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering

Published in

Construction and Building Materials

Volume

261

Publisher

Elsevier

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Rights holder

© Elsevier

Publisher statement

This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Construction and Building Materials and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119945.

Acceptance date

2020-06-10

Publication date

2020-07-03

Copyright date

2020

ISSN

0950-0618

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr Chris Goodier. Deposit date: 16 September 2020

Article number

119945

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC