Loughborough University
Browse

Feasibility and acceptability evaluation of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention for living well with dementia

Download (427.7 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-02-01, 14:00 authored by Emese Csipke, Esme Moniz-Cook, Phuong Leung, Lauren Yates, Linda Birt, Holly Walton, Eef HogervorstEef Hogervorst, Gail Mountain, Georgina Charlesworth, Martin Orrell
Objectives: Post-diagnostic psychosocial interventions could play an important role in supporting people with mild dementia remain independent. The Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention was developed to address this. Method: The mixed methods non-randomized, pre-post feasibility study occurred across England. Facilitators were recruited from the voluntary sector and memory services. Participants and their supporters took part in the three-session intervention. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and follow-up. To evaluate acceptability, focus groups and interviews were conducted with a subsample of participants and facilitators. Results: Contextual challenges to delivery including national research governance changes, affected recruitment of study sites. Thirty-four dyads consented, with 14 facilitators providing the intervention. Dyads took part in at least two sessions (79%), and 73% in all three. Outcome measures were completed by 79% without difficulty, with minimal missing data. No significant changes were found on pre and post assessments. Post hoc analysis found moderate effect size improvements for self-management (SMAS instrument) in people with dementia (d = 0.41) and quality of life (EQ5D measure) in carers (d = 0.40). Qualitative data indicated that dyads found PRIDE acceptable, as did intervention facilitators. Conclusions: The three-session intervention was well accepted by participant-dyads and intervention facilitators. A randomized controlled trial of PRIDE would need to carefully consider recruitment potential across geographically varied settings and site stratification according to knowledge of contextual factors, such as the diversity of post-diagnostic services across the country. Letting sites themselves be responsible for identifying suitable intervention facilitators was successful. The self-report measures showed potential to be included in the main trial.

Funding

PRIDE - Promoting Independence in Dementia

Economic and Social Research Council

Find out more...

University College London ESRC Doctoral Training Centre DTG 2011

Economic and Social Research Council

Find out more...

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Published in

International Psychogeriatrics

Volume

33

Issue

6

Pages

601 - 614

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Rights holder

© International Psychogeriatric Association

Publisher statement

This article has been published in a revised form in International Psychogeriatrics http://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220001386. This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be distributed. © International Psychogeriatric Association.

Acceptance date

2020-06-19

Publication date

2020-08-27

Copyright date

2021

ISSN

1041-6102

eISSN

1741-203X

Language

  • en

Depositor

Prof Eef Hogervorst. Deposit date: 30 January 2021

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC