This paper advances research on external urban relations by drawing attention to the role of
temporary project-based economic organisation in the formation of inter-firm links between
cities. Through a novel empirical examination of (trans)national co-production in the motion picture industry, we reveal how such projects transcend the boundaries of individual
production clusters and link urban centres within specific network configurations. Stripping away the ‘top layer’ of Hollywood’s commercially successful feature films, we undertake a social network analysis of film productions in four markets across three continents – China, Germany, France and Brazil – to provide a unique comparative analysis of networked urban geographies. Our findings show that film production networks are grounded in existing structural relations between cities. The spatial forms of these networks range from
monocentric in the case of the French film market, to dyadic in the case of China and
Brazil, to polycentric in the case of the German film market. Conceptually, we argue that
adopting an inter-firm project-based approach can account for the ways in which complex
patterns of inter-firm production relations accumulate to form (trans)national city-networks. Viewing city networks in this way provides an important alternative perspective to
dominant conceptualisations of global urban networks as formed through corporate intrafirm
relations.
History
Department
Geography and Environment
Published in
Urban Studies
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
943-959
Citation
HOYLER, M. and WATSON, A., 2019. Framing city networks through temporary projects: (trans)national film production beyond ‘Global Hollywood’. Urban Studies, 56 (5), pp.943-959.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Acceptance date
2018-07-02
Publication date
2018-10-03
Notes
This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Urban Studies and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018790735