This paper contributes to emerging debates about uneven global
geographies of higher education through a critical analysis of world university
rankings. Drawing on recent work in geography, international higher education
and bibliometrics, the paper examines two of the major international ranking
schemes that have had significant public impact in the context of the on-going
neoliberalization of higher education. We argue that the emergence of these
global rankings reflects a scalar shift in the geopolitics and geoeconomics of
higher education from the national to the global that prioritizes academic
practices and discourses conducted in particular places and fields of research.
Our analysis illustrates how the substantial variation in ranking criteria produces
not only necessarily partial but also very specific global geographies of higher
education. In comparison, these reveal a wider tension in the knowledge-based
economy between established knowledge centres in Europe and the United
States and emerging knowledge hubs in Asia Pacific. An analysis of individual ranking criteria, however, suggests that other measures and subject-specific
perspectives would produce very different landscapes of higher education.
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Geography and Environment
Citation
JöNS, H. and HOYLER, M., 2013. Global geographies of higher education: the perspective of world university rankings. Geoforum, 46, pp.45-59.
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in the journal Geoforum. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.12.014