Good cop, bad cop, both? Examining the implications of risk based allocation on the desistance narratives of intensive probationers
journal contributionposted on 2017-08-10, 09:13 authored by Chris KayChris Kay
The following paper shall discuss the implementation of the Coalition Governments Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) reforms in 2014 by focusing on the impact of these reforms on the desistance narratives of high risk intensive probationers, paying particular attention to the division of probation work between the National Probation Service (NPS) and the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC). It is argued that the reallocation of offenders between the NPS and CRC altered high risk probationers’ perceptions of self, caused probationers to question the occupational competence of CRC offender managers and saw probationers evidence the emergence of an attitudinal dissonance between the two services.
The research was funded by the University of Manchester Graduate Teaching Assistant scholarship.
- Social Sciences
- Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published inProbation Journal
Pages162 - 168
CitationKAY, C., 2016. Good cop, bad cop, both? Examining the implications of risk based allocation on the desistance narratives of intensive probationers. Probation Journal, 63 (2), pp. 162-168.
PublisherSage © The Author
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statementThis work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
NotesThis paper was accepted for publication in the journal Probation Journal and the definitive published version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0264550516637242.