Loughborough University
Browse

Guided recovery: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of service users' experiences of guided self-help for bulimic and binge eating disorders

Download (126.05 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-08-31, 15:35 authored by Carolyn PlateauCarolyn Plateau, F.A. Brookes, M. Pugh
The efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-based Guided Self-Help for mild to moderate bulimia and binge eating disorders has been well supported. However, limited research has explored in-depth individual experiences of this treatment approach. In depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with four individuals who had completed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy based Guided Self Help (CBT-GSH) for bulimic or binge eating disorders. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and subsequently analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Three superordinate themes emerged: Autonomy and volition; A dynamic relationship: the guided and the guide; and The unwanted friend. The reciprocal nature of the guide/guided relationship was identified as integral to the success of the therapeutic approach. However, participants expressed initial uncertainty towards the therapeutic process, and experienced an uncomfortable dissonance between a lack of volition in therapy seeking and the need to continually self-prescribe CBT-GSH. The findings affirm the central role of the guide in promoting motivation to engage with therapy and highlight the potential benefits of in-session weighing. However, it may be necessary to provide additional support on commencing CBT-GSH to address concerns about the therapeutic approach in this group.

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Published in

Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Volume

25

Issue

2

Citation

PLATEAU, C.R., BROOKES, F.A. and PUGH, M., 2017. Guided recovery: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of service users' experiences of guided self-help for bulimic and binge eating disorders. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 25(2), pp. 310-318.

Publisher

© Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies. Published by Elsevier Ltd

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Cognitive and Behavioral Practice and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2017.08.004.

Acceptance date

2017-08-19

Publication date

2017-09-09

ISSN

1077-7229

Language

  • en