This paper examines a relationship between heresy and utopianism forged in nineteenth- and
early twentieth-century socialist histories to reveal a significant and pervasive fault-line in the
ideological construction of anarchism. I look at Marxist narratives which trace the lineages of
socialism to medieval religious dissent and show how the sympathetic assessment of
European heretical movements was moulded by a critique of utopianism, understood as the
rejection of materialist ‘science’. I argue that strands of this narrative have been woven into
anarchism by looking at three accounts: E.V. Zenker’s Anarchism (1897), James Joll’s The
Anarchists (1964/1979) and Saul Newman’s From Bakunin to Lacan (2001). Their dominant
theme is that anarchism promises the transformation of corrupted nature, typically achieved
though ecstatic violence, cataclysmic revolution and future perfection. I describe this
Millenarian anarchism as a ‘straw man’ but rather than jettison ‘heresy’ as an investigative
tool, I refer to a conception of heresy as choosing to present an alternative account. Using
Martin Buber’s analysis of utopianism in Paths in Utopia (1949) and Michael Bakunin’s
critique of political theology, I pair utopianism with the rejection of perfection and heresy
with faith. This reframing of heresy corrects a deep-rooted, long-standing distortion of
anarchist ideas.
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in History of European Ideas on 12 May 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01916599.2020.1761646.