Home-based HIIT and traditional MICT prescriptions improve cardiorespiratory fitness to a similar extent within an exercise referral scheme for at-risk individuals
posted on 2021-11-23, 15:17authored byKatie Hesketh, Helen Jones, Florence KinnafickFlorence Kinnafick, Sam Shepherd, Anton Wagenmakers, Juliette Strauss, Matthew Cocks
Exercise referral schemes (ERS) are used to promote physical activity within primary
care. Traditionally, ERS are conducted in a gym or leisure-center setting, with exercise
prescriptions based on moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). Home-based
high-intensity interval training (Home-HIIT) has the potential to reduce perceived barriers
to exercise, including lack of time and access to facilities, compared to traditional MICT
prescription used with ERS and improve health related outcomes. We hypothesized
that Home-HIIT would mediate greater improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF)
by virtue of greater adherence and compliance to the exercise prescription, compared
to MICT.
Methods: Patients enrolled on an ERS (Liverpool, United Kingdom) were recruited for a
pragmatic trial. Participants self-selected either 12 weeks of MICT (45–135 min/week
at 50–70% HRmax) or Home-HIIT (4–9 min × 1 min intervals at ≥80% of HRmax,
interspersed with 1 min rest). The primary outcome was the change in CRF (VO2peak)
at post-intervention (12 weeks) and follow-up (3-month post intervention), using
intention-to-treat analysis.
Results: 154 participants (age 48 ± 10y; BMI 30.5 ± 6.1 kg/m2
) were recruited
between October 2017 and March 2019, 87 (56%) participants chose Home-HIIT
and 67 (44%) MICT. VO2peak increased post-intervention in both groups (MICT
3.9 ± 6.0 ml.kg−1
.min−1
, Home-HIIT 2.8 ± 4.5 ml.kg−1
.min−1
, P < 0.001), and was
maintained at follow-up (P < 0.001). Fat mass was only reduced post MICT (MICT
−1.5 ± 6.3 kg, P < 0.05, Home-HIIT −0.2 ± 2.0 kg, P = 1.00), but the reduction
was not maintained at follow-up (MICT −0.6 ± 5.1 kg, Home-HIIT 0.0 ± 2.2 kg,
P > 0.05). Adherence to the prescribed programs was similar (MICT 48 ± 35%,
Home-HIIT 39 ± 36%, P = 0.77).
Conclusion: This is the first study to evaluate the use of Home-HIIT for individuals
in a primary care setting. Contrary to our hypothesis, adherence to both exercise prescriptions was poor, and CRF improved to a similar extent in both groups with
improvements maintained at 3-month follow-up. We provide evidence that, although
not superior, Home-HIIT could be an effective and popular additional exercise choice for
patients within primary care based ERS.
Funding
Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust.
History
School
Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology
Volume
12
Publisher
Frontiers Media
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Publisher statement
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Frontiers Media under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/