Involving children in their healthcare encounter is a national and international priority. While
existing research has examined the ways in which children are recruited to participate in the
consultation, no work has examined whether and how children instigate talk, and the extent to
which their contributions are successful. This paper presents a conversation analysis of a
selection of 10 out of 30 video recordings in which children aged 4-10 years instigate talk during
consultations they attend with their parents/carers at a UK pediatric clinic. The analysis reveals
for the first time that children do successfully instigate talk without being asked or selected in
22 episodes during their consultation with the doctor. Children most frequently address their
parent/carer (16/22). They capitalize on specific contexts within the consultation to instigate
talk, for example: history-taking questions about what they ate or how they reacted (10/22); or
discussions surrounding the child’s feelings or sensations following the skin-prick testing (7/22)
- aspects of experience to which they have access. Children’s non-solicited talk necessarily
occurs when they are not currently active participators and children engage in extra
interactional work including various verbal strategies (summons and prosodic variations) and
non-verbal resources (tapping and gaze) to break into the interaction. The benefits of their
contributions include the opportunity to affirm the child’s role as a legitimate contributor, and
the potential for additional medically-relevant information to arise which could enrich the
clinical process. Our analysis shows that the previously overlooked phenomenon of children
instigating talk, although not common, can play a crucial role in the consultation. We suggest
that strategies to increase such involvement have the potential to augment the healthcare
process. Our findings offer a critical baseline for the introduction of new consultations models,
such as digital appointments, which may exclude some children completely.
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Elsevier under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/