Objections - Bloch and Antaki for Disc Studs 2022.pdf (350.46 kB)
Download file

How professionals deal with clients' explicit objections to their advice

Download (350.46 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 19.11.2021, 09:48 by Steven Bloch, Charles AntakiCharles Antaki
Previous literature on advice-resistance in medicine and welfare has tended to focus on patients' or callers' inexplicit resistance (minimal responses, silence and so on). But clients also raise explicit objections, which put up a firmer barrier against the advisor's efforts. In a novel look at resistance, we show that one important distinction among objections is their epistemic domain: whether the client's objection is in their own world (e.g. experiencing pain), or in the world of the practitioner (e.g. difficulties in making appointments). We show that the practitioner may try to manoeuvre the objection onto grounds where their own expertise will win the day, in five ways: conceding the objection's validity as a preface to moving on; proposing a 'work-around' that effectively repeats the original advice; selecting an aspect of it that could be remediated; correcting the client's understanding of the challenges of the advice; and stressing the urgency of the original course of action. We discuss the distinction between objections to solicited and unsolicited advice, and the role of objections in revealing, and affirming, a service-user's personal life-world contingencies.



  • Social Sciences and Humanities


  • Communication and Media

Published in

Discourse Studies


SAGE Publications


AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Rights holder

© The Authors

Publisher statement

This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Discourse Studies and the definitive published version is available at [insert DOI link]. Users who receive access to an article through a repository are reminded that the article is protected by copyright and reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses. Users may also download and save a local copy of an article accessed in an institutional repository for the user's personal reference. For permission to reuse an article, please follow our Process for Requesting Permission: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/process-for-requesting-permission

Acceptance date









Prof Charles Antaki. Deposit date: 18 November 2021