posted on 2023-03-22, 15:17authored byFrank Nyame-Asiamah, Bismark Yeboah Boasu, Peter KawalekPeter Kawalek, Daniel Buor
This study conceptualizes how fire management authorities can empower non-expert public to
participate in fire risk communication processes and increase their own responsibilities for
managing fire preventive, protective and recovery processes effectively. Drawing narratives
from ten disaster management experts working at government institutions and nine micro
entrepreneurs operating self-sustaining businesses in different merchandized lines in Ghana,
we analyzed the data thematically and explored new insights on mental models to generate a
two-way fire risk communication model. The findings suggest that fire management authorities
planned fire disasters at the strategic level, collaborated with multiple stakeholders,
disseminated information through many risk communication methods, and utilized their
capabilities to manage fire at the various stages of fire risk communication, but the outcomes
were poor. The micro entrepreneurs sought to improve fire management outcomes through
attitude change, law enforcement actions, strengthened security and better public trust building.
The study has implications for policymakers, governments and risk communication authorities
of developing countries to strengthen their fire disaster policies to minimize commercial fire
incidents and address the damaging effects of fire on people’s livelihoods, businesses,
properties and environments. Our proposed two-way fire risk communication model is a new
theoretical lens for experts and the non-expert public to assess each other’s beliefs about risk
information and manage fire risk communication effectively at all stages.
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Wiley under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/