Reply to Moisio and Harle from Marco version 3_to upload.pdf (41.54 kB)
In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle
journal contributionposted on 2014-10-23, 10:30 authored by Marco AntonsichMarco Antonsich
The author of a recently published paper on Finland's identity politics and national identity (Antonsich, 2005) responds to comments presented in the preceding paper in this issue of Eurasian Geography and Economics (Moisio and Harle, 2006). The rejoinder focuses on the nature of place knowledge acquired "in place" versus "at distance" as well as on more specific differences in perspective (e.g., use of sources, terminology, critical geopolitcs). Copyright © 2006 by V. H. Winston & Son, Inc. All rights reserved.
- Social Sciences
- Geography and Environment
Published inEurasian Geography and Economics
Pages211 - 215
CitationANTONSICH, M., 2006. In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47 (2), pp.211-215.
PublisherRoutledge (© V. H. Winston & Son, Inc)
- SMUR (Submitted Manuscript Under Review)
Publisher statementThis work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
NotesThis is an Submitted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Eurasian Geography and Economics on 15/05/2013 available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.2747/1538-7220.127.116.11