Eaves,Attridge&Gilmore_L&I.pdf (6.8 MB)
Download fileIncreasing the use of conceptually-derived strategies in arithmetic: using inversion problems to promote the use of associativity shortcuts
journal contribution
posted on 2019-01-30, 11:46 authored by Joanne Eaves, Nina Attridge, Camilla GilmoreCamilla GilmoreConceptual knowledge of key principles underlying arithmetic is an important precursor to understanding algebra and later success in mathematics. One such principle is associativity, which allows individuals to solve problems in different ways by decomposing and recombining subexpressions (e.g. ‘a + b – c’ = ‘b – c + a’). More than any other principle, children and adults alike have difficulty understanding it, and educators have called for this to change. We report three intervention studies that were conducted in university classrooms to investigate whether adults’ use of associativity could be improved. In all three studies, it was found that those who first solved inversion problems (e.g. ‘a + b – b’) were more likely than controls to then use associativity on ‘a + b – c’ problems. We suggest that ‘a + b – b’ inversion problems may either direct spatial attention to the location of ‘b – c’ on associativity problems, or implicitly communicate the validity and efficiency of a right-to-left strategy. These findings may be helpful for those designing brief activities that aim to aid the understanding of arithmetic principles and algebra.
Funding
This work was supported by a PhD Studentship from Loughborough University Doctoral college. C.G. is supported by a Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship.
History
School
- Science
Department
- Mathematics Education Centre
Published in
Learning and InstructionVolume
61Pages
84-98Citation
EAVES, J.M., ATTRIDGE, N. and GILMORE, C.K., 2019. Increasing the use of conceptually-derived strategies in arithmetic: using inversion problems to promote the use of associativity shortcuts. Learning and Instruction, 61, pp.84-98.Publisher
© ElsevierVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Learning and Instruction and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.01.004Acceptance date
2019-01-18Publication date
2019-02-21Copyright date
2019ISSN
0959-4752Publisher version
Language
- en